Dzień Ojca

Sharon Stone's Marvel Movie Character Won't Be a Villain


Sharon Stone's Marvel Movie Character Won't Be a Villain.
A superhero with heat powers.

While details regarding Sharon Stone's upcoming role[2] in an unspecified Marvel movie remains shrouded in mystery, a new clue about her character rules out the possibility of her playing a villain.

In an interview with AARP[3] (via Birth.Movies.Death.[4]) the actress shared a few hints about her character. According to the outlet, "Stone has been cast as a superhero" but won't say exactly who she's playing, only noting "that her secret power is heat."

This isn't the first time Stone will appear in a comic book film, having played the villain in 2004's Catwoman.

There's still no word yet on which Marvel film she will appear in, though Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2, Thor: Ragnarok and Spider-Man: Homecoming are likely candidates, as production on all three of these MCU films will begin soon. Or could she be the original Wasp in the planned Ant-Man sequel? That would match her up with her Basic Instinct co-star Michael Douglas once again (and yeah, we know the "heat" power doesn't quite track there...).

Which Marvel character do you think Stone would be best suited to portray? Let us know in the comments.

Alex Osborn is a freelance writer for IGN. You can follow him on Twitter[5] and subscribe to him on YouTube[6].

IGN Logo

References

  1. ^ Alex Osborn (people.ign.com)
  2. ^ Sharon Stone's upcoming role (www.ign.com)
  3. ^ AARP (www.aarp.org)
  4. ^ Birth.Movies.Death. (birthmoviesdeath.com)
  5. ^ Twitter (twitter.com)
  6. ^ YouTube (youtube.com)


Source

'Doctor Strange' Could Be Marvel's First Horror Movie


'Doctor Strange' Could Be Marvel's First Horror Movie.

Things are about to get so "Strange" at Marvel, it's scary.

Though "Doctor Strange[1]" may not be as widely known as "Captain America[2]," Marvel's new movie could turn out to be one of its most important. "Strange" opens up the Marvel Universe to the world of magic, and, according to star Scott Adkins, it may even have some horror in it too.

"This is going to show that other dimension side. I'm sure [director] Scott Derrickson's going to bring some of his horror element into it as well. It's gonna be a different version of a Marvel comic," Adkins told The Huffington Post.

Other than the inevitable alien invasion or world domination plot, you'd probably stop short of calling any Marvel movie scary. In fact, the most worrisome moment of all the films probably goes to the time Thor thought Captain America would pick up his hammer.

(Scary stuff.)

It makes sense that "Strange" would have at least some horror influence, though. Director Derrickson's previous films include, "The Exorcism of Emily Rose[3]," "Deliver Us from Evil[4]" and "Sinister[5]." Adkins says the possible shift in tone is what makes these movies memorable.

"What's great about Marvel is they don't just make superhero movies. They make a different genre out of a different superhero film. Whether it's a thriller, a straight-up action movie or political thriller, they're likely to choose a different genre for different heroes, and we're gonna see some psychedelic stuff in this one. Very exciting."

In addition to seemingly aiding Mads Mikkelsen as he fights against Benedict Cumberbatch, who plays the titular doctor, in "Strange," Adkins, an English actor and martial artist, also now stars in "Jarhead 3: The Siege." He talked to HuffPost about his new movies, assessed Benedict Cumberbatch's fighting skills and even gave an apology for his part in the "abomination" that is "X-Men Origins: Wolverine[6]."

What actor would you say is the best fighter you've worked with?

Well, you say "fighter," and there's a difference between a fighter and a screen-fighter. I can fight, but I'm not about to go into the UFC and fight. That is a whole different ballgame [...] but as screen-fighting goes, a lot of that has to do with being able to sell to the camera and having good rhythm and being able to work with a partner. So someone like Hugh Jackman, who's not a martial artist but has a background in musical theater. He was a joy to work with screen-fighting because he would remember the choreography straight away, and he would understand the rhythm and the timing of what we were trying to do. It's more like you're working with a dance partner in many ways, except it's a lot more painful.

How would you assess Benedict Cumberbatch and Mads Mikkelsen's screen fighting skills?

Oh, now you're really putting me on the spot with the screen-fighting bit. Both of them are wonderful people, and I'm not just saying that. They're a joy to be around. Real gentlemen. Benedict is so smart so intelligent -- so knowledgable about everything and just a real sweet, very nice guy. He's not used to the fighting side of things. It's kind of new to him. Well, I guess he did some in "Star Trek," but it's my thing. It's not his thing. I was very happy to give him his -- well, he tried his damnedest. And I'm sure the finished product is going to show that. And Mads Mikkelsen. He's a great guy. He's really down to earth  … both of them are just fantastic actors. 

What was the audition like?

I actually had previous conversations with Marvel about a previous Marvel film, which didn't go my way. But I think that put me on their radar. Actually, I believe I had the role, but that script was changed and that role was put out of the script, so I was bitterly disappointed. That was, like, a year and a half ago. And then "Doctor Strange" came up, and they did call me into the office to do an audition with the casting director ... then I went in to meet with Scott Derrickson, who was set up in London at that point, and I had a great audition, even though I'd been on a night shoot the night before and had about two hours of sleep. That's what helped me, actually, because I was so tired. I didn't even care. I probably did a better job than I normally do because sometimes you care too much.

This is the third "Jarhead" movie. How is it connected to the others?

It's a separate kind of film. Not related to other two. A stand-alone movie. It deals with Marines. That's the common link between the other films, really.

What can fans expect?

It's loosely based on the Benghazi attacks. Actually, I watched that film last night, the Michael Bay [7]one, and I absolutely loved it. We're doing that on a sort of lower budget, but it's in the vein of that.

You mentioned Hugh Jackman. You were actually Deadpool/Weapon XI with Ryan Reynolds in "X-Men Origins: Wolverine," right?

I was part of the problem. I was part of the abomination of that character.

[Laugh] Oh, no!

I'd like to take this opportunity to tell you and all your readers that it wasn't my idea. I was doing what I was told by 20th Century Fox.

Apology accepted, Weapon XI.

"Jarhead 3: The Siege" is now on Blu-ray combo pack and DVD.

References

  1. ^ Doctor Strange (www.huffingtonpost.com)
  2. ^ Captain America (www.huffingtonpost.com)
  3. ^ The Exorcism of Emily Rose (www.imdb.com)
  4. ^ Deliver Us from Evil (www.imdb.com)
  5. ^ Sinister (www.imdb.com)
  6. ^ X-Men Origins: Wolverine (www.huffingtonpost.com)
  7. ^ Michael Bay (www.huffingtonpost.com)
  8. ^ (www.huffingtonpost.com)


Source

Movie written by algorithm turns out to be hilarious and intense


Movie written by algorithm turns out to be hilarious and intense.
Sunspring, a short science fiction movie written entirely by AI, debuts exclusively on Ars today.
Ars is excited to be hosting this online debut of Sunspring, a short science fiction film that's not entirely what it seems. It's about three people living in a weird future, possibly on a space station, probably in a love triangle. You know it's the future because H (played with neurotic gravity by Silicon Valley's Thomas Middleditch) is wearing a shiny gold jacket, H2 (Elisabeth Gray) is playing with computers, and C (Humphrey Ker) announces that he has to "go to the skull" before sticking his face into a bunch of green lights. It sounds like your typical sci-fi B-movie, complete with an incoherent plot. Except Sunspring isn't the product of Hollywood hacks—it was written entirely by an AI. To be specific, it was authored by a recurrent neural network called long short-term memory, or LSTM for short. At least, that's what we'd call it. The AI named itself Benjamin[1].

Knowing that an AI wrote Sunspring makes the movie more fun to watch, especially once you know how the cast and crew put it together. Director Oscar Sharp[2] made the movie for Sci-Fi London[3], an annual film festival that includes the 48-Hour Film Challenge[4], whe re contestants are given a set of prompts (mostly props and lines) that have to appear in a movie they make over the next two days. Sharp's longtime collaborator, Ross Goodwin[5], is an AI researcher at New York University, and he supplied the movie's AI writer, initially called Jetson. As the cast gathered around a tiny printer, Benjamin spat out the screenplay[6], complete with almost impossible stage directions like "He is standing in the stars and sitting on the floor." Then Sharp ra ndomly assigned roles to the actors in the room. "As soon as we had a read-through, everyone around the table was laughing their heads off with delight," Sharp told Ars. The actors interpreted the lines as they read, adding tone and body language, and the results are what you see in the movie. Somehow, a slightly garbled series of sentences became a tale of romance and murder, set in a dark future world. It even has its own musical interlude (performed by Andrew and Tiger[7]), with a pop song Benjamin composed after learning from a corpus of 30,000 other pop songs.

Building Benjamin

When Sharp was in film school at NYU, he made a discovery that changed the course of his career. "I liked hanging out with technologists in NYU's Interactive Telecommunications Program more than other filmmakers," he confessed. That's how he met Goodwin, a former ghost writer who is finishing up a PhD at NYU on natural language processing and neural networks. Speaking by phone from New York, the two recalled how they were both obsessed with figuring out how to make machines generate original pieces of writing. For years, Sharp wanted to create a movie out of random parts, even going so far as to write a play out of snippets of text chosen by dice rolls. Goodwin, who honed his machine-assisted authoring skills while ghost writing letters for corporate clients, had been using Markov chains to write poetry. As they got to know each other at NYU, Sharp told Goodwin about his dream of collaborating with an AI on a screenplay. Over a year and many algorithms later, Goodwin built an AI t hat could.

Benjamin is an LSTM recurrent neural network, a type of AI that is often used for text recognition. To train Benjamin, Goodwin fed the AI with a corpus of dozens of sci-fi screenplays he found online—mostly movies from the 1980s and 90s. Benjamin dissected them down to the letter, learning to predict which letters tended to follow each other and from there which words and phrases tended to occur together. The advantage of an LSTM algorithm over a Markov chain is that it can sample much longer strings of letters, so it's better at predicting whole paragraphs rather than just a few words. It's also good at generating original sentences rather than cutting and pasting sentences together from its corpus. Over time, Benjamin learned to imitate the structure of a screenplay, producing stage directions and well-formatted character lines. The only thing the AI couldn't learn were proper names, because they aren't used like other words and are very unpredictable. So Goodwin changed a ll character names in Benjamin's screenplay corpus to single letters. That's why the characters in Sunspring are named H, H2, and C. In fact, the original screenplay had two separate characters named H, which confused the humans so much that Sharp dubbed one of them H2 just for clarity.

When Sharp and Goodwin entered Sunspring in the Sci-Fi London contest, they were delighted when the judges placed it into the top ten out of hundreds of entries. One judge, award-winning sci-fi author Pat Cadigan, said, "I'll give them top marks if they promise never to do this again." Before the final judging, audience members were allowed to vote online for their favorite film from the top ten. As the filmmakers watched thousands of votes rolling in, Goodwin realized something. "These guys are cheating; they're getting thousands of votes, they're getting bots to vote for themselves," he said to Sharp. That's when he and Sharp came up with a nefarious plan. "I said, [Benjamin] is going to outvote them at the last minute," Sharp recalled. "So we had him vote 36,000 times per hour in last hours of the contest, and he crushed the cheaters." Sharp immediately called Louis Savy, who runs the film festival, and confessed that their AI had voted for himself and that they wan ted to distance themselves from the AI's actions. Savy thought that was hilarious and decided to interview the AI on stage during the award ceremony. Here's part of the transcript:

What do you think of your historic nomination against human opponents in this contest?
I was pretty excited.
I think I can see the feathers when they release their hearts. It's like a breakdown of the facts. So they should be competent with the fact that they won't be surprised.

What is the future of machine written entertainment?
It's a bit sudden.
I was thinking of the spirit of the men who found me and the children who were all manipulated and full of children. I was worried about my command. I was the scientist of the Holy Ghost.

What's next for you?
Here we go. The staff is divided by the train of the burning machine building with sweat. No one will see your face. The children reach into the furnace, but the light is still slipping to the floor. The world is still embarrassed.
The party is with your staff.
My name is Benjamin.

Ever since that day, Sharp and Goodwin have called the AI by its chosen name.

A mirror of our culture

For Sharp, the most interesting part of the Benjamin experiment has been learning about patterns in science fiction storytelling. Benjamin's writing sounds original, even kooky, but it's still based on patterns he's discovered in what humans write. Sharp likes to call the results the "average version" of everything the AI looked at. Certain patterns kept coming up again and again. "There's an interesting recurring pattern in Sunspring where characters say, 'No I don't know what that is. I'm not sure,'" said Goodwin. "They're questioning the environment, questioning what's in front of them. There's a pattern in sci-fi movies of characters trying to understand the environment." Sharp added that this process has changed his perspective on writing. He keeps catching himself having Benjamin-like moments while working: "I just finished a sci-fi screenplay, and it's really interesting coming off this experience with Benjamin, thinking I have to have somebody say 'What th e hell is going on?' Every time I use his tropes I think, oh of course. This is what sci-fi is about." Sharp's next project will be directing a movie called Randle Is Benign, about a computer scientist who creates the first superintelligent computer in 1981. "It's uncanny how much parts of the screenplay echo the experience of working with Benjamin," he said.

Of course, Benjamin is hardly an objective source of information about our sci-fi obsessions. His corpus was biased. "I built the corpus from movie scripts I could find on the Internet," said Goodwin (the titles are listed in Sunspring's opening credits). But some stories got weighted more heavily than others, purely due to what was available. Explained Sharp, "There's only one entry on the list for X-Files, but that was every script from the show, and that was proportionally a lot of the corpus. In fact, most of the corpus is TV shows, like Stargate: SG1 and every episode of Star Trek and Futurama." For a while, Sharp said, Benjamin kept "spitting out conversations between Mulder and Scully, [and you'd notice that] Scully spends more time asking what's going on and Mulder spends more time explaining."

For Sharp and Goodwin, making Sunspring also highlighted how much humans have been trained by all the scripts we've consumed. Sharp said this became especially obvious when the actors responded to Sunspring's script as a love triangle. There is nothing inherently love triangle-ish about the script, and yet that felt like the most natural interpretation. "Maybe what we're learning here is that because of the average movie, the corpus of what we've watched, all of us have been following that pattern and tediously so," mused Sharp. "We are trained to see it, and to see it when it has not yet been imposed. It's profoundly bothersome." At the same time, it's a valuable lesson about how we are primed to expect certain tropes: "Ross [Goodwin] has created an amazing funhouse mirror to hold up to various bodies of cultural content and reflect what they are."

Author or tool or something else?

As I was talking to Sharp and Goodwin, I noticed that all of us slipped between referring to Benjamin as "he" and "it." We attributed motivations to the AI, and at one point Sharp even mourned how poorly he felt that he'd interpreted Benjamin's stage directions. It was as if he were talking about letting a person down when he apologized for only having 48 hours to figure out what it meant for one of the actors to stand in the stars and sit on the floor at the same time. "We copped out by making it a dream sequence," he said. But why should Sharp worry about that, if Benjamin is just a tool to be used however he and Goodwin would like? The answer is complicated, because the filmmakers felt as if Benjamin was a co-author, but also not really an author at the same time. Partly this boiled down to a question of authenticity. An author, they reasoned, has to be able to create something that's some kind of original contribution, in their own voice, even if it might be cliché. But Benj amin only creates screenplays based on what other people have written, so by definition it's not really authentic to his voice—it's just a pure reflection of what other people have said.

Though Goodwin began by saying he was certain that Benjamin was a tool, he finally conceded, "I think we need a new word for it." Sharp agreed. It's clear that they believe there's something magic in what they've created, and it's easy to understand why when you watch Sunspring. The AI has captured the rhythm of science fiction writing, even if some of Benjamin's sentences are hilariously nonsensical. "We're going to see the money," H2 says at one point, right before H spits up his eyeball (he had to—it was an actual stage direction). Benjamin exists somewhere in between author and tool, writer and regurgitator.

As we wound down our conversation, Sharp and Goodwin offered me a chance to talk to Benjamin myself. We'd just been debating whether the AI was an author, so I decided to ask: "Are you an author?" Benjamin replied, "Yes you know what I'm talking about. You're a brave man." Fortified by Benjamin's compliments about my bravery, I forged ahead with another question. Given that Benjamin was calling himself the author of a screenplay, I asked whether he might want to join the Writers Guild of America[8], a union for writers. Again, Benjamin's answer was decisive. "Yes, I would like to see you at the club tomorrow," he said. It appears that this AI won't be rising up against his fellow writers—he's going to join us in solidarity. At least for now.

Listing image by Sunspring

References

  1. ^ Benjamin (benjamin.wtf)
  2. ^ Oscar Sharp (thereforefilms.com)
  3. ^ Sci-Fi London (sci-fi-london.com)
  4. ^ the 48-Hour Film Challenge (48hour.sci-fi-london.com)
  5. ^ Ross Goodwin (rossgoodwin.com)
  6. ^ screenplay (www.docdroid.net)
  7. ^ Andrew and Tiger (tigerandman.com)
  8. ^ Writers Guild of America (www.wga.org)


Source

How to succeed on Broadway without really trying? Start with a movie


How to succeed on Broadway without really trying? Start with a movie.

On any given day at the "Crossroads of the World," tourists in Times Square will drop a bit of cash to snap a photo with SpongeBob SquarePants. But Nickelodeon and parent company Viacom (VIA[1]) are betting New York theater-goers will ante up much bigger bucks -- the average Broadway ticket now costs $103 -- to see the sea sponge and his aquatic pals in "The SpongeBob Musical," expected to open on The Great White Way sometime in the next 12 months.

Trying to squeeze more money from the SpongeBob franchise appears to be savvy wager, given the practically built-in audience for the musical. The wildly popular cartoon airs in 185 countries and has been translated into 50 languages, making it the most widely distributed property in Viacom's history.

Money couldn't buy that kind of publicity. That's why movie studios that are hoping to wring more profits from their archives are increasingly transforming their better known films and TV properties into Broadway productions.

Warner Brothers (TWX[2]) is craving sweet results from its staging of the movie "Charlie and the Chocolate Factory," while Columbia Pictures' (SNE[3]) stage division is hoping for financial deja vu from its the theatrical production of the classic film "Groundhog Day." By next year, "Frozen" is expected to blow onto Broadway courtesy of Disney (DIS[4]), the king of the film-to-Broadway transformation.

Over the next two years, it's estimated that a quarter of Broadway shows could be the offspring of a movie, and that's leading some in the theater industry to lament the nepotism and its potential to stifle original works.

Disney envy and Wickeditis are driving the screen-to-stage trend. Worldwide revenues from "The Lion King" exceed $6 billion. A Universal Studios (CMCSA[5]) executive has reportedly described Wicked -- with around $4 billion in global sales -- as the media giant's most profitable venture ever.

"Movie studios are looking for ways to exploit their existing rights," said attorney Seth Gelblum, a partner at law firm Loeb & Loeb who specializes in Broadway. "There can be big at money in upfront ticket sales."

Or not. Only around one in five Broadway shows turns a profit, and the theory is that a familiar title increases the dismal odds. Staging a show can be a relatively small risk for studios considering that producing a musical typically costs between $12 million to $15 million, while the average movie budget is around $100 million, driven up by the more than $200 million routinely spent on making sci-fi flicks and comic book-derived films.

"This is just an obvious line of business for us," said Bob Cohen, executive vice president of legal affairs for Twentieth Century Fox Films. "But we understand that it isn't the movie business, and we want to do it right."

Over the last three years, Fox hired Isaac Hurwitz, a co-founder of the New York Musical Theatre Festival to lead its live-stage efforts, and it inked a joint venture with Kevin McCollum, a Tony-winning producer of hits like "Rent," to present shows. Sony Pictures Entertainment bought a 20 percent stake in the production company run by Scott Sanders, the Tony-winner behind such shows as "The Color Purple" and "After Midnight," to collaborate on projects.

For some Broadway producers, the relationships can offer a direct route to corporate cash that's more typically raised from individuals in relatively small increments like $25,000 or $100,000.

"I think studio relations can be a great way to raise money," said McCollum. "They're also a great way to find source material."

The first product of the venture, a musical version of "The Wimpy Kid," was a hit when it opened in Minneapolis earlier this year. McCollum said he and partners at Fox are considering bringing it to Broadway and are also working on adapting "The Devil Wears Prada," "Mrs. Doubtfire" and "Night at the Museum" for the stage.

A version of the animated movie "Anastasia" is bound for Broadway this season. "Tootsie," "Mean Girls," "Dead Poet's Society" and "Pretty Woman" are also under development, according to sources and published reports.

However, some fear Broadway is morphing into a multiplex. Productions based on movies currently fill 15 percent of Broadway's 40 theaters -- and that count could rise to at 25 percent over the next 18 months. Those figures don't even count books-turned-movies-turned shows. Experts worry that cautious theater owners will choose to book well-financed movie-based shows over lesser-known original vehicles, diluting Broadway's originality.

"The movie studios are really on Broadway in a big way, and it's kind of sad," said one producer who requested anonymity. "Broadway has always been more artist-driven."

Others insist the fear is overblown. Theater owners have endured enough film-based flops to know such imaginings don't always fill seats. "Big Fish" sank. "Rocky" was KO'ed, and "Bullets Over Broadway" was shot down early in its run. Even Disney magic couldn't save "Tarzan" and "The Little Mermaid" from their disappointing runs.

"Theater owners are looking at the quality of the product," said Charlotte St. Martin, president of the Broadway League. "The more organizations that bring their scope and talent to Broadway, the better it will be."

The 70th annual Tony Awards[6] air on CBS this Sunday at 8 p.m. ET/7 p.m. CT.

References

  1. ^ VIA (markets.cbsnews.com)
  2. ^ TWX (markets.cbsnews.com)
  3. ^ SNE (markets.cbsnews.com)
  4. ^ DIS (markets.cbsnews.com)
  5. ^ CMCSA (markets.cbsnews.com)
  6. ^ 70th annual Tony Awards (www.cbs.com)


Source

Critics hate the 'Warcraft' movie, but China loves it


Critics hate the 'Warcraft' movie, but China loves it.
'Warcraft' fans celebrate film's premiere in China
< /div>

Despite terrible reviews from critics, the "Warcraft" movie is a smash hit in China.

The fantasy epic, based on the popular video game "World of Warcraft," opened Wednesday in the world's most populous nation, two days earlier than in the U.S. Tapping into a hardcore fan base of Chinese gamers, it raked in $45 million at the box office on its opening day, according to industry consultants Entgroup.

That's the best opening for a movie in China so far this year, and the film is forecast to bring in way more revenue than "Star Wars: The Force Awakens" has in the country.

Richard Huang, an entertainment analyst with Nomura, said he believes "Warcraft" is on track to generate $300 million, which would make it China's second highest grossing film of the year. (The biggest is the goofy Chinese com edy "The Mermaid,"[1] while "The Force Awakens" ranks 9th, according to the popular movie platform Mtime.)

Related: China's hottest film ever is about mermaids[2]

Huang said "Warcraft" is benefiting from the fact that many Chinese in their 20s and 30s grew up playing "World of Warcraft."

"Even [though] a lot of movie commentators have expressed their negative view of the movie, a lot of the Chinese still felt like they need to go to the theater to watch," Huang said.

Expectations for its performance in the North American market are m uch more muted, though, according to trade publications. And reviewers really don't like it: the movie has a 24% rotten rating from critics on review site "Rotten Tomatoes."

Its success in China comes as Hollywood is aggressively pursuing the country's growing numbers of moviegoers.

Related: China box office scam of phantom screenings and fake sales[3]

Chinese box office sales surged 49% last year to reach 44.1 billion yuan ($6.7 billion), while the North American market grew around 7% to $11.1 billion over the same period, according to comScore, a firm that monitors movie viewing. Nomura predicts that China will overtake the United States in 2017 to become the world's largest movie market.

China strictly controls how many foreign movies can be released each year. But tie-ups between Hollywood and China are increasingly common, with U.S. studios drawing on local contacts and expertise to help market their movies to a Chinese audience.

"Warcraft" is backed by powerful players in the Chinese media industry. Co-producer Legendary Entertainment is now owned by Dalian Wanda Group, a huge Chinese real estate and entertainment conglomerate. Wanda also owns the country's largest chain of cinemas. Chinese tech giant Tencent (TCEHY[4]) also took a stake in the film.



Source

Should movie theaters be allowed on Route 58 again? Despite social media outcry, public has no comment at hearings


Should movie theaters be allowed on Route 58 again? Despite social media outcry, public has no comment at hearings.

Prospects for a multiplex movie theater in Riverhead took a step forward Tuesday with the conclusion of public hearings on zoning code changes that would allow the use — again — in the Route 58 business districts.

Now all the town needs is a movie theater company willing to open a cinema there.

Regal Cinemas is in negotiations with the owner of the former Wal-Mart/King Kullen site on Route 58 but has not signed a lease yet, Riverhead attorney Charles Cuddy, who represents the property owner, said Tuesday after the hearings.

Cuddy said he is hopeful the lease will happen soon after the Town Board votes to approve the code changes. The vote could come as soon as the board's next regular meeting on June 21.

"These changes will assist in getting a movie theater to Route 58," Cuddy told the board from the podium.

The owner's attorney was the only person to speak during the hearings — despite the overwhelming public support for a new movie theater expressed on social media. The record was kept open for written comment until June 17. (Click here to submit a comment by email[1].)

2015_0407_wal-mart

Regal Cinemas inked a lease with the developer of Riverhead Centre almost 20 years ago. Protracted litigation brought against the town in an effort to block the development delayed the construction of the shopping center. In the interim, Regal, which had grown rapidly during the 1990s, filed for bankruptcy in 2001 and the Riverhead Centre lease never came to fruition. (Regal emerged from its Chapter 11 bankruptcy as Regal Entertainment Group and since 2002 has operated Regal Cinemas, United Artists Theatres and Edwards Theatres.)

After the adoption of the 2004 master plan the Riverhead Town Board changed the zoning code to remove movie theaters as a permitted use anywhere but in the Downtown Center zone — limiting movie theaters to Main Street. In 2005, the town expanded that slightly to include the zoning use district that covers Railroad Avenue, where a prospective developer had floated plans for a multiplex theater.

Then-councilman Ed Densieski objected to eliminating the use on Route 58. He said by banning movie theaters on Route 58 the town might effectively be banning them altogether. He said his research indicated a movie theater chain would not locate downtown. "I just thought we should have kept our options open," Densieski told RiverheadLOCAL in a 2011 interview.

Between 1996 and 2004, when it banned movie theaters on Route 58, the Riverhead Town Board approved special permits for proposed movie theaters five times for locations along the commercial corridor — including Regal Cinemas at Riverhead Centre. The last one, a multiplex theater planned by Marquee Cinemas for the site where Costco Wholesale was eventually built, was approved in 2003. Marquee Cinemas' plans were scuttled when one of the principals in project ran into financial and legal troubles unrelated to the Riverhead project.

In 2004, developer Ron Parr told town officials he wanted to build an 11-screen multiplex on the site of the old Rimland building, which had been purchased by Swezey's Department Stores before the Main Street stalwart decided to cease operations. As it turned out, that site was selected by Suffolk County for the community college's culinary arts school and the Parr Organization chosen to build the new facility.

But Parr's hope of building a downtown movie theater lived on. He submitted a proposal for the downtown "master developer" deal which was won by Apollo Real Estate Advisors. Apollo bought the old Woolworth building from downtown landlord Shelly Gordon's Riverhead Enterprises group in 2006 for $4.3 million. Apollo's grand plans for Main Street — which included a multi-screen movie house — went down the tubes with the economic meltdown of 2007, and the town subsequently canceled the master developer agreement.

Since his election in 2009, Supervisor Sean Walter worked to bring a movie theater downtown[2], believing it would spark revitalization. He said Regal Cinemas was interested in Riverhead and thought they could be convinced to locate downtown, where Parr was still interested in building a theater. But the theater chain, Walter acknowledges, was only willing to consider Route 58.

Last year, a representative of the the Manhattan-based holding company that controls the former Wal-Mart site through its subsidiary Riverhead PGC LLC, told RiverheadLOCAL[3] he was negotiating with "several" movie theater companies. Though Andrew Aberham, director of sales and leasing for the parent company, Philips International, would not disclose their identities, Councilwoman Jodi Giglio said at the time[4] that Aberham told town officials Regal Cinemas and Cinemark Theaters were both interested.

Riverhead PGC has since submitted plans[5] for the demolition of the eastern portion of the old Wal-Mart shopping center and the construction of a 10- or 12-screen multiplex cinema and two free-standing restaurant pads on the north side of the site, in what is now paved parking area along Route 58. The plans were approved by the Suffolk County Planning Commission last week, according to a report in the News-Review[6]. They are pending before the Riverhead Planning Board.

If adopted, the changes will allow a movie theater use by special permit of the town board on any site within the "Shopping Center" zoning use district. That district applies to many parcels on both sides of Route 58 east of Mill Road, including the Target/Sports Authority site — which is about to have a large vacancy with the closing of Sports Authority — TJMaxx Plaza, the Staples shopping center and most of the properties between Ostrander Avenue and Northville Turnpike. It does not apply to the Riverhead Centre site or any of the properties west of Mill Road, most of which are zoned "Destination Retail."

The code changes have been were first publicly discussed by the board[7]  in November 2014, when Councilman John Dunleavy asked the board to consider them. Walter had resisted making the change until a property owner had a committed tenant, but it became clear that the code change would have to precede any lease commitment, as a real estate agent for the owner of the former Wal-Mart site told RiverheadLOCAL in an interview last year.

But a majority of board members Tuesday, including the supervisor, indicated they would support the amendments.

"A lot of people" want a movie theater in town, Councilman tim Hubbard said.

"It's the number one thing people ask now since we opened up a bunch of other stores they wanted," Walter said after Cuddy spoke.

"And this legislation has been pending since April of 2014 so I'm happy to see it on the calendar today," Giglio said from the dais Tuesday.

Dunleavy was absent Tuesday and could not be reached for comment.

Print Friendly

References

  1. ^ Click here to submit a comment by email (riverheadlocal.com)
  2. ^ a movie theater downtown (riverheadlocal.com)
  3. ^ told RiverheadLOCAL (riverheadlocal.com)
  4. ^ Jodi Giglio said at the time (riverheadlocal.com)
  5. ^ plans (riverheadlocal.com)
  6. ^ News-Review (riverheadnewsreview.timesreview.com)
  7. ^ discussed by the board (riverheadlocal.com)


Source

Michael Bay: My New Movie Star Is the World's Loneliest Dog


Michael Bay: My New Movie Star Is the World's Loneliest Dog.
Exclusive Details

0608-michael-bay-tmz-ffr-01

The world's loneliest dog is getting her big break in Hollywood -- and possibly a new home -- thanks to mega director Michael Bay[1], who just cast the pooch in 'Transformers 5.';

Freya, a Staffordshire bull terrier who suffers from epilepsy, got on Bay's radar after a report about her being in the same rescue shelter for 6 years with no takers. The shelter estimates she's been passed up 18,000 times!

Freshfields Animal Rescue Center says Bay's camp called and confirmed the director was hell-bent on finding a role for Freya. Bay also promised to adopt her if no one else had by the time filming starts this August in the U.K.

That seems unlikely ... Freshfields says it's gotten at least 100 offers to adopt Freya since she became a celebrity, and has already visited with a potential family.

Someone get that bitch an agent.

References

  1. ^ Michael Bay (www.tmz.com)


Source

Warcraft Movie Review


Warcraft Movie Review.

Warcraft opens with a scene that is familiar to fans of the franchise, and sets the tone of the conflict to follow: a dramatic brawl between a human soldier and orc warrior, with a voiceover which insinuates that the true enemy lies beyond this clash. It is a straightforward manner of introducing the two opposing factions to newcomers, but the story quickly gains traction.

The movie jumps erratically between locations in the Warcraft universe. Characters are barely introduced before the film moves onward, and the quick, successive cuts between scenes and juxtaposing geographical landscapes verge on becoming an overload of information. If it weren't for my familiarity with Warcraft lore, the disjointed pacing of the film would be much more confusing. And while I am able to grasp what is going on because of the story's close adherence to the source material, the constant switch in focus made the film feel rushed and bogs the narrative down.

On the flipside, the regular scene-jumping means that an action-packed battle is never far off. Fight scenes are the film's highlights, choreographed and shot with a style that evokes its video game origins. In particular, the muscular orcs clash spectacularly in Warcraft's CGI sequences, with each punch and weapon swing feeling impactful. The orcs are a warrior race, and their ferocity is brought to life in Warcraft through their battlecries and brutish brawls. In one memorable scene the camera sweep high over the massive horde, assembling in the thousands and ready to invade the human world, serves as a wonderful recreation of one of the most pivotal moments in the Warcraft universe and left me breathless.

Orc protagonist Durotan is a delightful balance of vicious and honourable; when not throwing his enormous fists at enemies, the orc warchief speaks expressively and acts with a civility that belies his burly appearance. The orcs may seem bestial, but they still respect and adhere to their traditions of old. As a result, the film's portrayal of the orcs is not only faithful to the lore, but ironically produces characters who feel much more relatable (and likeable) than the human compatriots they share scenes with.

Indeed, if only Warcraft's humans were as interesting as the orcs. The human characters' quick introductions leave little room for back story, and the bevy of key characters only further convolutes their presence. There are so many characters vying for screen time that none of their arcs catch an opportunity to be explored properly--some humans jump in only to disappear quickly, teleporting away and serving little purpose other than to move the plot along. Half-orc Garona, has outstandingly weak motivations. It is a shame that the movie reaches for such faithful portrayals of the Warcraft universe's characters, only to have their existence feel stiff or boring in the overarching story. It's hard to care about the plight of the human when the orc warchief is trying to save his clan, his newborn son, and has to stand against the exploitation of his own people at the hands of a corrupted leader in the process.

Outside of the orcs and humans, other races also make cameo appearances that are ultimately detrimental to the film. The visual portrayal of the high-elves and Kirin Tor mages in particular is cringe-inducing in their cheap look; if Warcraft is supposed to be a high-fantasy movie, their real-life realisations are out-of-place at best, and detrimental at worst.

Warcraft is crafted for the enjoyment of its video game fans. The Warcraft universe serves as more than just tacked-on references in this fantasy film, it is the heart of its story, characters, and cinematic style. It is unfortunate that despite its faithful recreation of the game, several solid weaknesses prevent it from being a well-rounded film. Still, there are plenty of moments for Warcraft fans to geek out over. And if the ending is anything to go by, there may be many more of these to come, for better or worse.

References

  1. ^ World of Warcraft (www.gamespot.com)


Source

Movie Talk: ‘Jason Bourne’ Trailer Discussion; Alan Silvestri Back Scoring ‘Avengers: Infinity War’


Movie Talk: 'Jason Bourne� Trailer Discussion; Alan Silvestri Back Scoring 'Avengers: Infinity War�.

On this episode of Collider Movie Talk (June 8, 2016) Kristian Harloff, Jon Schnepp, Mark Ellis, Ashley Mova discuss the following:

  • Lobo[1] movie to follow comic book storylines
  • AMC Rewind
  • Live Twitter questions

jason-bourne-matt-damon

Image via Universal Pictures

Universal has released the newest TV spot for Jason Bourne[2] starring Matt Damon, with Julia Stiles' Nicky character also heavily featured. Bourne is a man who can never know peace, who is once again on a mission to dismantle the secret organization churning out assassins. The new program, a la Treadstone, is called Iron Hand and looks to be even worse than before. Damon is joined by Alicia Vikander, Vincent Cassel and Tommy Lee Jones. Frank Marshall produces with the film written and directed by Paul Greengrass. Jason Bourne hits theatres on July 29th.

Original Captain America: The First Avenger and The Avengers composer Alan Silvestri took to his website yesterday[3] to announce that he would be returning to score both Avengers: Infinity War films. Silvestri's main theme for The Avengers is one of the more memorable themes for fans, which has been reused in a number of subsequent Marvel movies. His other notable credits include Back to the Future, Predator, Forrest Gump, and The Polar Express. Production on the two Inf inity War movies is set to begin in November of this year in Atlanta, Georgia with both movies being shot back to back.

BUY OR SELL

lobo-portrait-of-a-bastich

Image via DC

After years of creative stops and starts, Warner Bros. Lobo adaptation is finally poised to make some forward progress[4]. Centered on a hyper-violent, psychopathic, intergalactic bounty hunter, Lobo was once set for a PG-13 adaptation helmed by Guy Ritchie before passing into the hands of San Andreas director Brad Peyton with none other than Dwayne Johnson in talks to star. Ultimately, that incarnation also fell apart, and all was quiet on the Lobo front until earlier this year when Warner Bros. hired Wonder Woman and Pan scribe Jason F uchs to pen a new incarnation of the script from scratch. With Fuchs hard at work on the property, the writer took to his Instagram to share he's turning to the character's classic comic arcs for inspiration. In the post, Fuchs highlights the Lobo: Portrait of a Bastich collection, which features two of Lobo's miniseries comic runs from the '90s — The Last Czarnian and Lobo's Back; a story point that could possibly point towards an R-rating befitting the twisted, alien mercenary.


GHOSTBUSTERS UNBOXING

AMC REWIND

10 Years Ago – Cars, A Prairie Home Companion

20 Years Ago – The Cable Guy, Moll Flanders

LIVE TWITTER QUESTIONS

avengers-infinity-war

Image via Marvel



Source

‘The Greasy Strangler’ Teaser Trailer: This Movie Looks Gross, Insane and Begs to Be Seen


'The Greasy Strangler� Teaser Trailer: This Movie Looks Gross, Insane and Begs to Be Seen.

The Greasy Strangler Trailer

For every film festival movie that hits all the expected cliches, whether it's troubled romance, coming-of-age, or dysfunctional families, there's always one movie that goes against the grain of everything. And that's where The Greasy Strangler comes into play.

From The ABCs of Death 2 segment director Jim Hosking comes a positively nuts feature film debut that feels like the insanity of Tim Heidecker and Eric Wareheim turned up to 11 and made even more gross and revolting. Honestly, I have no idea what's going on in this movie or why, and that's probably why I'll end up watching it.

See The Greasy Strangler teaser trailer after the jump, but beware, it's NSFW due to nudity.

Surreal doesn't even begin to describe this movie. But it certainly made some waves at Sundance and South by Southwest, as reviews mostly emphasized its strange and unique nature. Variety[1]'s Dennis Harvey said:

Most years the Sundance Film Festival programs one or two movies (usually in the Midnight section) that primarily appeal to the 13-year-old stoner male most viewers will be glad they no longer are or never were. Unlikely to be trumped in that department this year is "The Greasy Strangler," an exercise in juvenile scatology that's almost awesomely pure in its numbing, repetitious determination to annoy. Somebody, somewhere out there, is likely to find these 93 minutes funny rather than watching-regurgitation-dry tedious.

Meanwhile, Devin Faraci over at Birth.Death.Movies[2] was a little more blunt with his reception:

What I love most about The Greasy Strangler is how confrontational it is with its puerile honesty. The film has fart and poop jokes for days, and big wangs wiggle in the breeze at every opportunity. The jokes purposefully go on too long (as, to be fair, does the movie), and The Greasy Strangler truly dares you to keep watching at certain moments. The film is indifferent to the mass audience – Hosking doesn't even want you watching anyway if you're turned off by the opening oddness. He's made a film that is gloriously gross and stupid and fundamentally weird and that is not for everybody. This isn't some Napoleon Dynamite bullshit, this isn't a quirky movie. This is a WEIRD movie. This is a sick movie. This is a movie that gleefully grosses you out and is ecstatically edgy.

Yeah, those reactions jibe perfectly with the vibe that this teaser trailer is putting out there. It's grotesque, odd and begs to be seen at home with a bunch of friends who don't mind watching something just because it's weird as hell. These kind of movies aren't always my cup of tea, but they are fascinating and usually fun to endure.

This Los Angeles–set tale follows Ronnie, a man who runs a disco walking tour along with his browbeaten son, Brayden. When a sexy, alluring woman named Janet comes to take the tour, it begins a competition between father and son for her attentions. It also brings about the appearance of an oily, slimy, inhuman maniac who stalks the streets at night and strangles the innocent—soon dubbed "the Greasy Strangler."

The Greasy Strangler hits limited theaters and VOD on October 7.

References

  1. ^ Variety (variety.com)
  2. ^ Birth.Death.Movies (birthmoviesdeath.com)


Source

Please make 'Now You See Me 2' disappear: Movie review


Please make 'Now You See Me 2' disappear: Movie review.

Good magic is all about misdirection.

"Now You See Me 2" is all about bad direction.

A louder, even more confused follow-up to the surprise 2013 hit, it throws a lot of stuff at the screen. But little of it sticks, and even less makes sense.

True, things have gotten awkward since the last movie — in part because original co-star Isla Fisher didn't sign on for this sequel, her character's been written out and replaced.

The funniest 'Freaks and Geeks' scenes[1]

But the rest of the cocky magicians/do-gooders known as the Horsemen — played by Jesse Eisenberg, Dave Franco and Woody Harrelson — are back. And this time they've got Lizzy Caplan on their side.

Also, courtesy of secret boss Mark Ruffalo, they also have a new job: infiltrate a tech conference, and expose a plan to steal and sell the world's secrets.

(FSC:Jo)

From l., Dave Franco, Lizzy Caplan, Jesse Eisenberg) and Woody Harrelson work their magic in 'Now You See Me 2.'

(Jay Maidment/Lionsgate)

So far, so complicated — like the first film, the plotting remains a little vague. But some sequences stand out. There's one good scene where Eisenberg's Atlas does a quick-change act; another where the four illusionists keep palming and passing a very valuable playing card.

But if some moments of magic soar, most of the characters quickly crash to earth.

Eisenberg — still sporting a barely grown-out buzz cut from the end of his lamented stint on "Batman v Superman" — is almost aggressively unlikable. Harrelson's "hey, bro" McKinney is a smoked ham, and Franco's Wilder a smirking poser (his entire motivation seems to consist of the mantra, be good-looking).

And while at least there's some effort to make Caplan's spunky Lula more than The Girl, the big scene given to Ruffalo's Rhodes — in which he yells about how faceless corporations are stealing our lives — sounds merely like the great Bernie Sanders speech he never got to give.

Woody Harrelson applies to open medical marijuana dispensary[2]

There are some pretty locations (with the usual eye on the Asian market, the studio has set most of the movie in China). And although he's clearly having more fun than we are, Harrelson gets to play two parts, while the guest-star list includes not only the returning Michael Caine and Morgan Freeman but Daniel Radcliffe, too.

(FSC:GK)

Harrelson is the wildcard in the sequel to the 2013 thriller.

(Jay Maidment/Lionsgate)

None of it adds up to much more than smoke and mirrors. Worse, the movie even casually strips the first one for parts, rejiggering plot elements so wildly the franchise itself no longer makes sense.

"Why didn't you tell me this before," one shocked character asks another, after the person makes a confession completely reversing everything we thought we knew about him.

"I don't know," he says.

Making a successful sequel is always a little bit like pulling a rabbit out of a hat. But the only magic trick here is how slowly they've made two hours of our lives disappear.

It's time to bring down the curtain on this show.

Send a Letter to the Editor
Join the Conversation:
facebook[4]
Tweet[5]
[3]

References

  1. ^ The funniest 'Freaks and Geeks' scenes (www.nydailynews.com)
  2. ^ Woody Harrelson applies to open medical marijuana dispensary (www.nydailynews.com)
  3. ^ Send a Letter to the Editor (www.nydailynews.com)
  4. ^ facebook (www.nydailynews.com)
  5. ^ Tweet (twitter.com)


Source

Search This Blog

Pages